A comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability

TitleA comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsAllison, JR, Müller M, van Gunsteren WF
Volume19
Pagination2186-2195
Keywordshelix, molecular dynamics, peptide stability, α-peptide, β-peptide
Abstract

The right-handed α-helix is the dominant helical fold of α-peptides, whereas the left-handed 314-helix is the dominant helical fold of β-peptides. Using molecular dynamics simulations, the properties of α-helical α-peptides and 314-helical β-peptides with different C-terminal protonation states and in the solvents water and methanol are compared. The observed energetic and entropic differences can be traced to differences in the polarity of the solvent-accessible surface area and, in particular, the solute dipole moments, suggesting different reasons for their stability.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.504

Publications by Jane Allison

Allison, JR, Riniker S, van Gunsteren WF. 2012. Coarse-grained models for the solvents dimethyl sulfoxide, chloroform, and methanol. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 136: 054505-11
Kunz, A-PE, Allison JR, Geerke DP, Horta BAC, Hünenberger PH, Riniker S, Schmid N, van Gunsteren WF. 2012. New functionalities in the GROMOS biomolecular simulation software. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 33: 340-353
Allison, JR, Bergeler M, Hansen N, van Gunsteren WF. 2011. Current computer modeling cannot explain why two highly similar sequences fold into different structures. Biochemistry. 50: 10965-10973
Allison, JR, Boguslawski K, Fraternali F, van Gunsteren WF. 2011. A refined, efficient mean solvation force model that includes the interior volume contribution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 115: 4547-4557
Eichenberger, AP, Allison JR, Dolenc J, Geerke DP, Horta BAC, Meier K, Oostenbrink C, Schmid N, Steiner D, Wang D et al.. 2011. GROMOS++ software for the analysis of biomolecular simulation trajectories. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 7: 3379-3390
Schmid, N, Allison J, Dolenc J, Eichenberger A, Kunz A-P, van Gunsteren W. 2011. Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 51: 265-281