| Title | A comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2010 |
| Authors | Allison, JR, Müller M, van Gunsteren WF |
| Volume | 19 |
| Pagination | 2186-2195 |
| Keywords | helix, molecular dynamics, peptide stability, α-peptide, β-peptide |
| Abstract | The right-handed α-helix is the dominant helical fold of α-peptides, whereas the left-handed 314-helix is the dominant helical fold of β-peptides. Using molecular dynamics simulations, the properties of α-helical α-peptides and 314-helical β-peptides with different C-terminal protonation states and in the solvents water and methanol are compared. The observed energetic and entropic differences can be traced to differences in the polarity of the solvent-accessible surface area and, in particular, the solute dipole moments, suggesting different reasons for their stability. |
| URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.504 |
A comparison of the different helices adopted by α- and β-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability
Publications by Jane Allison
2012.
Coarse-grained models for the solvents dimethyl sulfoxide, chloroform, and methanol.
The Journal of Chemical Physics.
136:
054505-11
2012.
New functionalities in the GROMOS biomolecular simulation software.
Journal of Computational Chemistry.
33:
340-353
2011.
Current computer modeling cannot explain why two highly similar sequences fold into different structures.
Biochemistry.
50:
10965-10973
2011.
A refined, efficient mean solvation force model that includes the interior volume contribution.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
115:
4547-4557
2011.
GROMOS++ software for the analysis of biomolecular simulation trajectories.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.
7:
3379-3390
2011.
Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software.
Journal of Biomolecular NMR.
51:
265-281
